Dodge Dakota ForumDodge Dakota PhotosDodgeDakota.net Membership
  Forums   Forum Tools
05:23:51 - 06/01/2024

V8 Dakotas
FromMessage
bbarnes
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

7/17/2002
21:25:03

Subject: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
Whats the difference in the SLT and the R/T?



iwantart
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


7/17/2002
21:39:13

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
hmmm $9-10,000



scott
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


7/17/2002
21:43:21

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
I don`t know every difference but here`s a few.
The R/T has 17 in wheels and is about 2in. lower.
It also has bigger swaybars front and rear and is only available with the 360 V8 and the auto. tranny.



Stuarth
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


7/17/2002
22:05:38

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
The SLT has Chrome bumbers and grill. The R/T has color molded grill and bumbers. The SLT is suppost to have a higher quality cloth for the interior. The R/T only comes with the 5.9L 360 CI engine. The STL has that option in the Quad Cab. There are a lot 'little' differences, its hard to name them all.

My SLT stickered about $2,000 less than a simmilar R/T.







kota on 20s
GenIII
 Email User Profile


7/17/2002
23:43:18

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
for 10k more than a SLT you could buy a lightning... not that you should, but you could ;-)

Eric, 98 5.2 5speed, K&N gen II, 50mm TB, 2bbl M-1, 1.7RR's, JBA ciramic headers, carsound cat, dumped gibson, and a lot more

Waltherone
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

7/18/2002
00:54:10

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
I thought the R/T was only lowered 1" in the rear?



kota on 20s
GenIII
 Email User Profile


7/18/2002
00:56:19

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
1" all the way around is what i have heard.

Eric, 98 5.2 5speed, K&N gen II, 50mm TB, 2bbl M-1, 1.7RR's, JBA ciramic headers, carsound cat, dumped gibson, and a lot more

5pnt9ltrluv
R/T
 Email User Profile


7/18/2002
02:46:35

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
It is 1" all around as compared to the other packages. The R/T's come with the following:

5.9L motor
1' lower suspension
3.92 Gears
LSD
46RFE Auto Tanny
17" rims
Color matched Grille, front, and rear bumpers
Color matched fender flares (I think these are now offered with the SXT package, but not color matched...not sure)
Larger side mirrors
Infinity sound
I think that is pretty much it. I am not totally sure of what the SLT has.



Hope this helped...



Kris

Powerdyne w/ 9#, True dual Flowmaster 40's, MSD 6A w/ Blaster SS coil, Taylor 8mm, Flowmetrics 50mm t- body, JBA headers, Autolite 3923's, 180 degree T-stat, , Ported 1.92 R/T heads, 4bbl M1, 24# injectors, Crower 1.7 Roller Rockers, Hotchkis 2/3 w/ Nitro shocks, GTS hood

Bernd
*GenIII*
 Email User Profile


7/18/2002
09:07:30

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
That's 46RE Kris. ;) Hey...hows the new tube holding up?

The main differences between the R/T and SLT is the suspension (1" drop) and body options (trimmings - fender/bumpers). Trans and Engine can be ordered with the SLT as well (along with the gears).




1997 Dodge Dakota SLT - V6
Supercharged/Intercooled @ 10# w/Nitrous
14.55 @ 96.01mph

5pnt9ltrluv
R/T
 Email User Profile


7/18/2002
09:50:24

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
Bernd- OOPS! I know it is 46RE, I have big hands...hit F on accident..hehe.
Tube is doing awesome! I called Randy and ordered the 11# pulley and the tensioner. So I am ready to DEVESTATE more cars....



Kris

Powerdyne w/ 9#, True dual Flowmaster 40's, MSD 6A w/ Blaster SS coil, Taylor 8mm, Flowmetrics 50mm t- body, JBA headers, Autolite 3923's, 180 degree T-stat, , Ported 1.92 R/T heads, 4bbl M1, 24# injectors, Crower 1.7 Roller Rockers, Hotchkis 2/3 w/ Nitro shocks, GTS hood

scott
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


7/18/2002
12:04:59

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
But you can`t get the 5.9 with the 5-speed with an R/T!



R/Truck
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

7/18/2002
12:15:13

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
I didn't think you could get the manual tranny with any 5.9L dakota. The last manual dakota was a 318 I believe, and the Ram 5.9L used a different tranny, one built for towing not speed.



5pnt9ltrluv
R/T
 Email User Profile


7/18/2002
12:54:07

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
The LAST manual V8 Dakota is the 4.7L

But you are right in that the RAM tranny was built to pull not to go fast. Though I have heard of people bolting up (with extra tweaking) the Manual from a 318 to the 360. Since it is the same block.





Kris

Powerdyne w/ 6#, True dual Flowmaster 40's, MSD 6BTM w/ Blaster SS coil, Taylor 8mm, Flowmetrics 50mm t- body, JBA headers, Autolite 3923's, 180 degree T-stat, , Ported 1.92 R/T heads, 4bbl M1, 24# injectors, Crower 1.7 Roller Rockers, Hotchkis 2/3 w/ Nitro shocks, GTS hood

Bernd
*GenIII*
 Email User Profile


7/20/2002
00:20:57

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
The NV3500 will handle the 5.9L without any problems...ask the 4x4 SLT owners who opted for this. ;)


1997 Dodge Dakota SLT - V6
Supercharged/Intercooled @ 10# w/Nitrous
14.55 @ 96.01mph

bbarnes
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

7/20/2002
00:36:45

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
So I should be able to get a lot of speed out of the 5.2L SLT as compared to an R/T?



kota on 20s
GenIII
 Email User Profile


7/20/2002
01:31:59

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
if you get a 5speed, it will help level the playing feild, if not, mods to mods, the R/T will win.

Bernd, when could you get a 5.9 5speed combo in a slt? QC?

it dosent really matter though, duner's trans in his 12 sec truck is holding up just fine. ;-)

Eric, 98 5.2 5speed, K&N gen II, 50mm TB, 2bbl M-1, 1.7RR's, JBA ciramic headers, carsound cat, dumped gibson, and a lot more

Bernd
*GenIII*
 Email User Profile


7/20/2002
09:12:19

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
Kota: 1997-1999 (ClubCab or QuadCab)


1997 Dodge Dakota SLT - V6
Supercharged/Intercooled @ 10# w/Nitrous
14.55 @ 96.01mph

kota on 20s
GenIII
 Email User Profile


7/20/2002
12:23:24

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
bernd ARE YOU SURE??? i bought my truck in 98, and there was no way i could get a 360 with a 5speed. i had to settle for the 318. i have also never heard of anyone with that combo unless they converted it themselvs.

Eric, 98 5.2 5speed, K&N gen II, 50mm TB, 2bbl M-1, 1.7RR's, JBA ciramic headers, carsound cat, dumped gibson, and a lot more

Big59er
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


7/20/2002
17:43:41

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
I thought duner said that there werent any current mopar trannys that could handle the 5.9's torque (with the acception of the viper tranny)



Mr.6
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


7/20/2002
17:46:07

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
Stuarth, Man im glad you pointed out the plus'es to owning an SLT... I always make sure to look for a good quality bumper when im buying a new vehicle. Thnx.



kota on 20s
GenIII
 Email User Profile


7/20/2002
19:15:59

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
Big 59, i talked to duner at the tucon meet, and he told me that he has had no problems with his trans... and that is with a couple of hundred passes on it with the turbo setup
also, martain saine has a VERRY FAST dakota (i heard it is in the 11 sec range) and it has the 5speed as well.

Eric, 98 5.2 5speed, K&N gen II, 50mm TB, 2bbl M-1, 1.7RR's, JBA ciramic headers, carsound cat, dumped gibson, and a lot more

Hersbird
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

7/20/2002
21:23:27

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
Bernd you are wrong on this one, the 5.9 never has had a 5-speed in any form of Dakota, 4x4, 2x4, RC, QC, CC, whatever... The NV3500 is just not rated by NV to allow that much input torque. The Rams use the NV4500 with the 360. The nv3500's don't always stand up behind 318's and 4.7's with a few mods, let alone with 13% more torque stock on a 360. It just wouldn't cover the warranty claims to put the NV3500 behind the 360, especially with the manufacturer washing their hands of it because it excedes their design specifications. Now then think all the problems of driveshafts and axles with the low first gear multiplication factor of the 5-speed. There would be even more problems there.



kota on 20s
GenIII
 Email User Profile


7/20/2002
23:31:21

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
if a 5speed can not withstand the torque of a stock 360, how does it stand up to 11, and 12 sec trucks?

Eric, 98 5.2 5speed, K&N gen II, 50mm TB, 2bbl M-1, 1.7RR's, JBA ciramic headers, carsound cat, dumped gibson, and a lot more

Hersbird
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

7/22/2002
01:09:39

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
I'm not aware of how many 11 and 12 second trucks out there have the 5-speed besides Duners and it's turbo having to build torque may be a lot easier on the drivetrain then would say a stock 360 or blown 318 would. And I'm sure there are some out there that will survive a while, but will they survive a full warranty period with enough consistancy not to eat up all the profits? New Venture I'm sure did a bunch of durability testing on their nv3500 to come up with an acceptible input torqe rating. One that the transmission could live with for the long haul. The fact that New Venture doesn't rate the nv3500 for the 360's stock torque is one reason you don't see the 5-speed as an option on the R/T, I'm sure of that. The same reason you won't see a 4.7 HO/5-speed combo in a Dakota either. The other big reason is that the extra torque multiplication of the 1st gear would require heavier axles and driveshafts.



xplikt
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


7/22/2002
01:23:12

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
Hersbird, Turbos are awesome on trannies for the fact that what they produce in the the later gears is no where near what a stock vehicle does in first gear.

"The other big reason is that the extra torque multiplication of the 1st gear would require heavier axles and driveshafts."

Yupp!


Stuarth forgot to mention however, that the SLT bumper works very well in an accident!



xplikt
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


7/22/2002
01:25:43

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
Oh yeah, that's also one of the reasons I think a stroked 4.7L would rip the tranny a new one.



Dak318
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


7/22/2002
15:25:29

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
Along with my Dakota I also drive a 96 Ram 2500 that belongs to my brother. It has a 360 with a 5-speed, it can go about 130mph.



dakdude
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE


7/22/2002
16:49:44

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
I thought this was suppose to be about what the differences are between an R/T and an SLT?

Get off the 5-speed soapbox!!!

Oh yea, what does going 130 have to do with the strength of the tranny??




Hersbird
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

7/22/2002
23:38:51

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
Your friends ram also has a NV4500 not a NV3500.



dakpower
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

7/24/2002
17:35:17

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
What is the difference between the 45RFE and the 46RE transmissions?




splinkman
Dodge Dakota
JOIN HERE
 Email

7/25/2002
00:40:08

RE: Difference in SLT and R/T
IP: Logged

Message:
RT's come standerd with the heavy duty service group also



   P 1 Next Page>>


 



Home | Forums | Members | Pictures | Contact Us

This site is in no way affiliated with Chrysler or any of its subsidiaries.